Anti-imperialist struggle in Latin America
“Eleven years ago [when
I was first elected] I was quite gullible. I even believed in a ‘third way’.
I believed it was possible to put a human face on capitalism, but I was wrong.
The only way to save the world is through socialism… . Capitalism is
destroying the world.” — Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, BBC TV Hardtalk
interview, 13 June 2010
It will come as no surprise to regular readers of Lalkar
that the US ruling class of big industrialists and even bigger financiers,
and their executive committee in the White House and on Capitol Hill, remain
hell-bent on destroying Hugo Chávez and the national-democratic revolution he
and his United Socialist Party (PSU) are spearheading in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Not only has Chávez forcefully challenged the
economic and political hegemony of US imperialism over his country, until
relatively recently a supine yanqui neo-colony, but he has also linked
up with other progressive regimes in Latin America — notably that of socialist
Cuba — to push for completing the process of regional liberation, begun by
Simón Bolívar in the first half of the nineteenth century, and putting
socialism firmly back on the agenda from the Rio Grande to Tierra del Fuego.
For the imperialists, this is intolerable. US
monopoly capital, and its comprador puppets in the Latin American
countries and elsewhere, will not “go gentle into that good night” which
— sooner rather than later — awaits them as a result of their systemic crisis,
their addiction to wars of aggression throughout the globe, and the resistance
of oppressed and exploited peoples which crisis and war have strengthened and
accelerated.
Instead, counter-revolutionary conspiracies of one
kind or another have become ever more desperate wherever the victims of
imperialism are standing up and fighting back in anything approaching an
organised fashion. In the case of Venezuela, the most blatant example of US
intervention to date came on 11 April 2002.
For the details of this episode, we give the floor
to historian Henry Suárez, whose excellent and comprehensive 2010 booklet US
Interventions in Latin America is available free of charge via the
Venezuelan Embassy in London or by e-mailing asanchez@venezlon.co.uk:
“The Venezuelan president, Hugo Rafael
Chávez Frias, was overthrown by a coup d’état. The military, businessmen, trade
unionists and media who were behind the coup, many of whom were funded, and
would continue to be funded in the following years, by the US Department of
State through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and USAID, were
congratulated by the US ambassador Charles Shapiro at the moment of recognising
the dictator Pedro Carmona, who lasted only 48 hours in power.
“This corresponded with the declaration of [then]
President George W Bush, who said that President Chávez was responsible for
the political crisis at the same time that he refused to classify what had
happened as a coup d’état.
“In the words of Ari Fleischer, White House
spokesman, ‘Chávez resigned’ [!]“
It’s worth noting here, in passing, that the reason
Carmona lasted only 48 hours in power is that the workers and small peasants of
Venezuela quickly rallied around their president Chávez, the country’s
legitimate leader, and – in many cases with weapons in hand – forced the
US-sponsored usurper to flee.
Monopoly-capitalist pressure on Venezuela’s anti-imperialist government and people has not relented, however, since the
defeat of the counter-revolutionary coup. Quite the contrary. As the Venezuelan
people prepare for crucial parliamentary elections in late September, various US state agencies – and the US and European media who objectively serve them – are already operating
behind the scenes to help achieve one of two things.
The best result for US imperialism would be the
outright defeat of the PSU in the National Assembly (an outcome which, given
the support Chávez continues to enjoy among the Venezuelan masses, seems
extremely unlikely). Alternatively, and less satisfyingly for Washington, a PSU
victory could be challenged as being the result of electoral fraud – and this
line could be sufficiently well propagated that it gains currency in at least
certain sections of international public opinion.
The reality of the situation is as follows. If the
opposition to Chávez, the PSU and their supporters — which include the
Communist Party of Venezuela – wins more than 33 per cent of the seats in the
National Assembly, that opposition (an alliance of the old bourgeois parties,
the social-democrats of PODEMOS and the renegade ex-Chavistas of Homeland
for All [PPT]) will be able to block further progressive legislation –
including more expropriations of the big industrial firms, the banks, health
services and the huge latifundista landowners. The Venezuelan masses,
however, are likely to be as firm in defending their revolutionary aspirations
at the ballot box as they were, eight years ago, on the streets.
That US imperialism is ultimately behind the
opposition is not in doubt, whatever other questions the forthcoming elections
may throw up. The “independent” – ie. bourgeois – media, the main mouthpiece
for anti-Chávez forces, is known to have received nearly $5 million over the
last three years from the US State Department.
All but three of Venezuela’s top 10 newspapers
openly support the counter-revolution, and they just happen to be privately
owned – with links to companies in the USA.
The general view among workers, peasants and
progressive intellectuals in the northern part of South America (where only Colombia now remains in total neo-colonial bondage) seems to be one of optimism. “Venezuela vencerá [Venezuela will win]!” is the main slogan doing the rounds
internationally at the moment in the run-up to the National Assembly elections.
Lalkar joins in that chant and sends President Chávez our revolutionary
best wishes for victory in the forthcoming elections. We also offer our firm
solidarity with his political programme, which seeks to take Venezuela ever closer to grassroots democracy, genuine independence and socialism.
The organised libel and slander aimed at Hugo
Chávez, his United Socialist Party and the national-democratic revolution which
defines his time in office in Venezuela, is not confined to that country’s
bourgeois media alone, nor to that of the US.
As an example of the lying pro-imperialist
propaganda aimed at trying to destabilise the Bolivarian process in Venezuela and at giving succour to the counter-revolutionary opposition, we quote our
‘own’, liberal, Guardian:
“A crackdown on opposition was highlighted …
when an arrest warrant [was] issued for the owner of the TV channel
Globovisión, which takes a critical line against Chávez. Guillermo Zuloga has
since gone into hiding…” (Guardian, 13 June 2010). Actually,
the TV station in question remains open and the said Mr Zuloga was subsequently
interviewed by BBC TV, with a potential audience of several million people. So
much for “hiding”!
And it gets worse. In the last eight months alone,
President Chávez has variously been described in Britain’s capitalist press as
“a thug”, “an ignoramus”, “a vengeful dictator”, “an
egotistical liar” and “a jumped-up peasant”. The class snobbery
implied by this last epithet notwithstanding, and without challenging any of
the other insults in detail, what really upsets the monopoly bourgeoisie
is that Chávez is an anti-imperialist and a revolutionary democrat. What’s
more, the bastard seems to be winning!
Meanwhile, a bit further north but still in Latin
America, the people of socialist Cuba are rejoicing at the return to the public
stage of their commander-in-chief and the Leader of the Revolution, Comrade
Fidel Castro. At a specially convened meeting of Cuba’s parliament, the
National Assembly of People’s Power, Fidel drew an ecstatic standing ovation
when he walked into the chamber flanked by president Raúl Castro and Assembly
speaker Ricardo Alarcón.
In his first return to political life since he
retired for reasons of ill health a full five years ago, Fidel warned of the
threat to global peace posed by US imperialist sabre-rattling against Teheran
over its development of nuclear energy. If either Washington or its Zionist
surrogates in Tel Aviv attacked Iran, the veteran revolutionary and statesman
declared, the planet could be faced with a new world war — with the
possibility of nuclear weapons being used for the first time in sixty-five
years.
Fidel took advantage of his renewed strength and
energy to travel widely around Cuba, holding informal discussions with workers
at the National Centre for Scientific Research, the Centre for Research into
the World Economy, and the Havana aquarium — whose staff include the daughter
of iconic revolutionary Che Guevara.
More recently, he greeted a team of 200 Cuban
internationalist volunteers who had just returned from medical missions helping
disabled people in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua.
Fidel’s impromptu remarks at that homecoming sum up
the strengths of socialism and the moribund condition that monopoly capitalism
now finds itself in:
“Our force”, he said, “which brought joy
to close to 800,000 people [in four neighbouring countries], is no more
than a wisp of what can be done for the people of this hemisphere and the rest
of the world, without charging a single cent for it. The most important thing
is the example that you have bequeathed to the youth who, together with you,
have begun to undertake that task in the heart of their nation and in other
countries.
“In all of its history,” the Cuban leader
continued, “the [US] empire has not been capable, nor could it ever
do the same with even one per cent of this amount. What use is such a system?”
Yes, indeed, Comrade Fidel, what use is the system
of capitalism and imperialism? Except for the capitalists and imperialists.
While internationalist
missions – both humanitarian and military – by Cuban volunteers are legendary
and have spanned the globe, there is no co-incidence in the fact that this
particular contingent of aid workers was sent to four of the Latin American
countries which are building an increasingly strong regional bloc against US imperialism, led by socialist Cuba and Bolivarian Venezuela.
Lalkar wishes
the oppressed and exploited peoples of Latin America well in their continuing
struggle for freedom, dignity and an end to US imperialist domination.